Please see here for more information about this release and contact Symantec Enterprise Technical Support for Macintosh products to obtain a copy of this. There is a Corporate version of this product available. Symantec has released Norton AntiVirus for Macintosh 11.0.3, which is fully qualified for use with Mac OS X 10.6, Snow Leopard.
![]() Norton Antivirus Snow Leopard Mac OS X 10Links to view quarantined items and log in to your AVG account round out the window. Don't worry the moment you attempt to save or launch an attachment, the Mac Shield scans it.You can use the Scan Mac button at center bottom to launch various types of antivirus scans. The third icon, Email Shield, will eventually scan incoming email attachments for malware, but the feature is not yet ready. Web Shield works to divert your browsing away from malicious or fraudulent pages. Mac Shield refers to real-time protection, scanning new files as they arrive. A large dark grey expanse holds three icons penned in by a darker rectangle: Mac Shield, Web Shield, and Email Shield. If you're a prudent user who always accepts operating system upgrades, this shouldn't be a problem. Avira and Norton want 10.11 (El Capitan) or higher. Pricing and OS SupportLike Sophos and McAfee, AVG requires macOS 10.10 (Yosemite) or higher. Out of the box, this feature is disabled turning it on seems like a good idea. Like Avast, AVG can scan your Time Machine backups for malware. For most users the defaults are fine, with one exception. With McAfee, that $59.99 subscription price gets you unlimited licenses, not just three. Half of the current products fit that model, and most of those give you three licenses for $59.99 per year. If you want to use AVG in a business setting, you must pony up for the business edition.Commercial Mac antivirus pricing centers on just under $40 per year for a single license. However, like Avast, AVG is only free for noncommercial use. Sophos Home Free (for Mac), Avast, and Avira are among the other vendors offering free antivirus for macOS. These three can handle versions all the way back to 10.6 (Snow Leopard).As noted, AVG is completely free. Both protected against 99.90 percent of the lab's Mac malware samples, detected 100 percent of the Windows malware samples, and earned this lab's certification.AV-Test Institute also included Avast in its latest report, but not AVG. I don't perform that level of testing on macOS, so results from the two labs that test Mac antivirus become very important.As I mentioned, Avast now owns AVG, so I wasn't surprised to see that the two earned precisely the same scores from AV-Comparatives. I use virtual machines, so if malware wreaks havoc, I just revert to an earlier snapshot. That's not as dangerous as it sounds. Good Malware Protection ScoresWhen reviewing Windows antivirus utilities, I look at test results from four independent labs, and I also perform my own hand-on testing with live malware. How much does it cost for a big mac today 2015On the Apple MacBook Air 13-Inch I use for testing, this scan finished in less than four minutes. Scan ChoicesIf you just click the big Scan Mac button, AVG scans the most likely places for malware traces. They received certification from both labs, earning 100 percent protection against Mac malware in both cases. We can hope that AVG would have scored the same, but the labs are very clear: results apply only to the precise product tested.Bitdefender and Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac are the big winners, as far as lab results go. AVG promises to detect and remove Windows and mobile malware, in addition to malware aimed at macOS.To test AVG's skills against Windows malware, I copied my current malware collection from a thumb drive to the desktop. True, malware designed for Windows can't run on a Mac, but eliminating it means there's no chance of it somehow leapfrogging to a Windows system on your network. I suggest that you run a Deep Scan immediately after installing AVG, to root out any hidden nasties.Almost all the Mac antivirus utilities I've reviewed include the ability to detect Windows malware as well. AVG, like Sophos, Malwarebytes, and a few others, eschews the scheduled scan, figuring that real-time protection should handle any new threats. Even the Deep Scan only took 15 minutes, just a hair longer than Avast, and well below the current average of 24 minutes.Avast, Avira Free Antivirus for Mac, ClamXAV, and several others include the option to define a scan schedule. Whatever the platform, you've lost control of that account.My phishing test starts with hundreds of suspected phishing URLs, scraped from websites that specialize in tracking and reporting on them. If you log in to a fraudulent site, thereby giving the fraudsters your credentials for the actual site, it doesn't matter if you did it on a PC, a Mac, or a browser-equipped refrigerator. Poor Phishing ProtectionWhile viruses, Trojans, and other typical types of malware necessarily target a specific operating system, phishing attacks are totally platform-agnostic. Sophos has the best score this test, with 100 percent of Windows malware eliminated. Interestingly, I tested Avast with my previous malware collection and it weighed in at 85 percent, almost the same. A File Scan on the folder eliminated a few more, for a total of 86 percent. AVG's Web Shield works quite differently. Symantec Norton Security Deluxe (for Mac) scored quite a bit lower in this test than the comparable Windows edition.Many phishing protection systems replace the fraudulent page with a warning message in the browser, explaining that proceeding to the site would be dangerous, but allowing the user to override the warning. Alas, my handy program runs strictly on Windows, so my antiphish testing on macOS is a manual cut and paste affair.In my testing, I've learned that while phishing frauds themselves are platform-independent, defense against phishing is not. I wrote a simple program to launch each URL simultaneously in all five, and record with one click whether it blocked or missed a fraud, or whether the URL turned out not to be a phishing fraud after all. Initially it scored 32 percentage points behind Norton, which is in the same ballpark as AVG's 39 points. On the plus side, this is significantly better than the score earned by AVG AntiVirus Free.Then I remembered that I had a similar experience with Avast. Among Mac antivirus products, only Avira has done worse, running 47 percent below Norton's detection rate. AVG's detection rate was 39 percent lower than Norton's, and all three browsers beat it handily using their built-in protection. What's Not HereAVG covers the basics, with protection against Mac, Windows, and mobile malware. I'll revisit this review when the browser extensions come out. Bitdefender on Windows did even better, 12 points above Norton.Alas, browser extensions for AVG's Mac antivirus aren't yet ready, so phishing protection totally relies on the less-effective Web Shield component. Only Bitdefender Antivirus for Mac has done better, outscoring Norton by 5 percentage points. When I repeated the test using Chrome, Avast tied with Norton and beat all three browsers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTina ArchivesCategories |